Class 12 Mathematics 1 Mathematical Logic Exercise 1.2 Solutions | Maharashtra Board
Class 12 Mathematics 1 – Mathematical Logic
Exercise 1.2 – Solutions
Topic: Truth Tables, Logical Equivalences, Tautology, Contradiction and Contingency
Q.1. Construct the truth table for each of the following statement patterns.
i) [(p → q) ∧ q] → p
Answer: Construct the truth table using the columns p, q, p → q, (p → q) ∧ q and [(p → q) ∧ q] → p.
ii) (p ∧ ~q) ↔ (p → q)
Answer: Construct the truth table using the columns p, q, ~q, p ∧ ~q, p → q and the final biconditional.
iii) (p ∧ q) ↔ (q ∨ r)
Answer: Since three variables are involved, the truth table contains 8 rows.
iv) p → [~(q ∧ r)]
Answer: Since three variables are involved, the truth table contains 8 rows.
v) ~p ∧ [(p ∨ ~q) ∧ q]
Answer: The final statement is always false.
vi) (~p → ~q) ∧ (~q → ~p)
Answer: Construct the truth table using p, q and the two implications.
vii) (q → p) ∨ (~p ↔ q)
Answer: Construct the truth table using p, q and the two component statements.
viii) [p → (q → r)] ↔ [(p ∧ q) → r]
Answer: The final statement is a tautology.
ix) p → [~(q ∧ r)]
Answer: Since three variables are involved, the truth table contains 8 rows.
x) (p ∨ ~q) → (r ∧ p)
Answer: Since three variables are involved, the truth table contains 8 rows.
Q.2. Using truth tables prove the following logical equivalences.
To prove a logical equivalence, construct the truth table and show that the final columns of both sides have identical truth values.
i)
~p ∧ q ≡ (p ∨ q) ∧ ~p
Result: Proved.
ii)
~(p ∨ q) ∨ (~p ∧ q) ≡ ~p
Result: Proved.
iii)
p ↔ q ≡ ~[(p ∨ q) ∧ ~(p ∧ q)]
Result: Proved.
iv)
p → (q → p) ≡ ~p → (p → q)
Result: Proved.
v)
(p ∨ q) → r ≡ (p → r) ∧ (q → r)
Result: Proved.
vi)
p → (q ∧ r) ≡ (p → q) ∧ (p → r)
Result: Proved.
vii)
p ∧ (q ∨ r) ≡ (p ∧ q) ∨ (p ∧ r)
Result: Proved.
viii)
[~(p ∨ q) ∨ (p ∨ q)] ∧ r ≡ r
Result: Proved.
ix)
~(p ↔ q) ≡ (p ∧ ~q) ∨ (q ∧ ~p)
Result: Proved.
Q.3. Examine whether each of the following statement patterns is a tautology, contradiction or a contingency.
| Q. No. | Statement Pattern | Answer |
|---|---|---|
| i) | (p ∧ q) → (q ∨ p) | Tautology |
| ii) | (p → q) ↔ (~p ∨ q) | Tautology |
| iii) | [~(~p ∧ ~q)] ∨ q | Tautology |
| iv) | [(p → q) ∧ q] → p | Contingency |
| v) | [(p → q) ∧ ~q] → ~p | Tautology |
| vi) | (p ↔ q) ∧ (p → ~q) | Contingency |
| vii) | ~(~q ∧ p) ∧ q | Contingency |
| viii) | (p ∧ ~q) ↔ (p → q) | Contradiction |
| ix) | (~p → q) ∧ (p ∧ r) | Contingency |
| x) | [p → (~q ∨ r)] ↔ ~[p → (q → r)] | Contradiction |
Important Definitions
1. Tautology: A statement which is true for every possible combination of truth values.
2. Contradiction: A statement which is false for every possible combination of truth values.
3. Contingency: A statement which is true for some combinations and false for others.
Comments
Post a Comment